claude/agitated lovelace 016480#20
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ryandmonk
commented
Jul 10, 2026
Contributor
- fix: align astryx example contract with Astryx v0.1.4
- feat: add 'scheduling' intent + ex.book-consultation worked example (owner-approved)
card.variant -> default/muted/color variants; text gains semantic 'type' (as: span/p/div/label only). Found by dspack-studio's drift check against 'astryx component --json'. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…owner-approved)
Additive, v0.4-safe: no existing rules or intents change; the scheduling
few-shot corpus gains one authored, lint-clean example (the dspack-studio
appointment-booking surface). The proposed required-composition rule
('scheduling surfaces must carry a confirm button') is deliberately NOT
added — it is an evaluation hypothesis, not governance (owner decision):
availability browsing, rescheduling, and informational scheduling surfaces
could be incorrectly rejected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the Astryx example dspack contract to match the upstream Astryx v0.1.4 API/docs and expands the example set with a new “scheduling” intent and a worked booking surface, keeping the repository’s example contracts aligned with their upstream sources.
Changes:
- Bump the Astryx example contract pin from v0.1.2 → v0.1.4 (version/source links, commit hash, and component/rule provenance URLs).
- Update the Astryx component vocabulary to match v0.1.4 (notably Card variant options and Text typography/heading modeling).
- Add a new
schedulingintent plus a new worked example surfaceex.book-consultation.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| examples/README.md | Updates the Astryx example’s pinned version text to v0.1.4. |
| examples/astryx.dspack.json | Aligns the Astryx example contract with upstream v0.1.4 and adds a new scheduling intent + booking example surface. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.